Flowers for Algernon by Daniel Keyes
REVIEW: 5 / 5 stars
Flowers for Algernon is not just a classic science fiction novel, but classic literature period, and should be taught in every high school senior year English literature class. Algernon is a special laboratory mouse for whom an operation to increase his intelligence lasts longer than any other animal test subject.
The protagonist of the novel, Charlie Gordon, is the first human test subject in this science experiment, and he is chosen for his amicability, willingness to learn, and low risk of failure being perceived as malpractice due to his level of natural mental retardation.
This is so well written, and some parts are truly heart wrenching. When I finished, I was crying catharticly and needed to squeeze my loved ones close because I never want to lose them the way certain characters are lost in this book.
Flowers for Algernon was first published as a short story in 1959, and then expanded into a book for 1966 publication. There has also been a film adaptation and a West End, London musical production.
I would definitely recommend reading the print version, because a lot of information is gained by having the story written from Charlie Gordon’s perspective. The format is told as though readers are reviewing all of Charlie Gordon’s journal entries written throughout the duration of his involvement with the scientific experiment. Spelling and grammar development is crucial to character development here, which would be essentially completely lost if you listened to an audio version or just watched the movie.
Overall, this deals with a lot of engaging themes and issues that lends itself well to classroom discussion and essay assignments. Key aspects include: gaining knowledge without accompanying wisdom, family dynamics, recognition and forgiveness, memory loss, personhood, unconditional love, ethics in scientific research, and caring for the mentally impaired. I am especially sensitive to memory loss and mental retardation as topics due to my family history, and I think this book handles those subjects with thought and respect.
Gender roles and relations aren’t very healthy, but this was published in the ’60s, so I try to take that into account. I would still recommend this to many, especially those working on scientific research with human subjects, medical ethics, or in the care of mentally impaired persons.